Mr. Price freed from Shawnee County Jail

          Mr. David Martin Price is now freed from Shawnee County Jail, after coerced and extorted, by order of Kansas Supreme Court, to sign or be held indefinitely, until he signed that he would not assist in any legal matter or administrative matter, where there is no law against this in the State of Kansas.
          Mr. Price feels that this is racketeering and monopolizing the legal industry, when the Federal Trade Commission already addressed this issue in a letter to the Kansas Bar Association dated 02/04/05 on UPL (Unauthorized Practice of Law), in which stated, “that people know the difference between non-attorney’s and attorneys and they have a right to choose, it regulates their prices, as well as, the field of practice according to the Fair Trade Act, Sherman Act, as well as, the case law doctrine,” in which both Kansas Federal District Court, and Kansas Supreme Court are refusing to acknowledge.
          Mr. Price had filed 5 Habeas Corpuses pursuant to 28 USC 2254, in which were ignored by Federal Court. Mr. Price was found guilty of giving oral argument, in which he was subpoenaed to be there to give oral argument in his own case. On 12/07/07, even (2) Kansas Supreme Court Justices, inclusive the Chief Justice of Kansas Supreme Court stated, “that the order on 12/07/07 mirrored Jack Lively’s decision, in which was null and void, due to the fact that the case was still pending in Federal Appeals Court, in which two courts cannot hold the same jurisdiction over the same case.” 
         The (2) Justices also stated that, “Kansas Supreme Court failed to give Mr. Price a fair opportunity to be heard on the permanent injunction, and that the injunction did not have equal remedy for equal relief, and that the state never pled, argued, shown any evidence that Mr. Price had committed any of these acts, in which the state of Kansas claimed against Mr. Price.
          Mr. Price feels that this constitutes extortion, coercion, and it was done under duress.  The State of Kansas never had shown any specific injury, or how Mr. Price had injured anyone, by assisting them, in which constitutes a sweeping complaint under 28 USC §1331 (see ref KBA v. Judges of the Third Judicial District 84,545(Kan S. Ct.)(2000). Mr. Price feels that this is monopolizing the legal industry. The State stated during the Hearing on 12/05/07, “that in the future Mr. Price could injure someone by giving bad legal advice.”
          Mr. Price did not know that you could be convicted of a crime you have not yet committed, but Mr. Price stated, “that if the State of Kansas was concerned about injuries to others, the State of Kansas should not have gone after Mr. Eldon Ray and the Mayetta Christian Church, due to the fact they were exempt by KSA 60-3601, in which exempts volunteers for a church.” Mr. Eldon Ray is still out $3,122.00 attorney fees, in which the state has not compensated him, in which the Senate Joint Review Committee, and the Senate Ways and Means Committee approved.
          The State also had hired a private attorney to represent Kansas Board of Technical Professions, in which is against the Non-Delegation Doctrine, since we already have an Attorney Generals Office and a Consumer Protection Division.
          Mr. Price stated for the record, “that this is proven fact that no good deed goes unpunished, in which is so in this case.”
          Now Kansas is attempting to make laws to force people to go to counseling prior marriage and prior to getting divorced, in which is in conflict with David Barton book entitled, “ Original Intent”, on Church vs. State. 
          Mr. Price doesn’t think people understand the monopoly, in which the court sub-contracts out therapy, in which goes into the court general funds, in which 15% to 25% of this goes into the Judges retirement funds, whereby they can drag out the therapy until the court drains you out of financial funds or assets.